<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: R. Kelly Trial Countown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://popsquire.com/r-kelly/r-kelly-trial-countown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://popsquire.com/r-kelly/r-kelly-trial-countown/</link>
	<description>where pop culture and law collide...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:11:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Roberts</title>
		<link>http://popsquire.com/r-kelly/r-kelly-trial-countown/comment-page-1/#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 03:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popsquire.com/?p=451#comment-282</guid>
		<description>he is a pedophile . He should be shot , hung , quartered and burned .
any person who disagrees with this is either a pedophile or a rapist or a bleeding heart liberal that is related to one of these degenerates . or just plain stupid</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>he is a pedophile . He should be shot , hung , quartered and burned .<br />
any person who disagrees with this is either a pedophile or a rapist or a bleeding heart liberal that is related to one of these degenerates . or just plain stupid</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R. Kelly Trial Must Move Along &#171; Popsquire</title>
		<link>http://popsquire.com/r-kelly/r-kelly-trial-countown/comment-page-1/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>R. Kelly Trial Must Move Along &#171; Popsquire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 12:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popsquire.com/?p=451#comment-281</guid>
		<description>[...] to the Chicago Sun Times, his attorneys have filed a sealed motion to delay his child pornography trial &#8211; scheduled to begin to tomorrow &#8212; due to &#8220;publicity.&#8221;   The judge likely [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to the Chicago Sun Times, his attorneys have filed a sealed motion to delay his child pornography trial &#8211; scheduled to begin to tomorrow &#8212; due to &#8220;publicity.&#8221;   The judge likely [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k</title>
		<link>http://popsquire.com/r-kelly/r-kelly-trial-countown/comment-page-1/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 07:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popsquire.com/?p=451#comment-280</guid>
		<description>do not past go. go straight to jail!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>do not past go. go straight to jail!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://popsquire.com/r-kelly/r-kelly-trial-countown/comment-page-1/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 20:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popsquire.com/?p=451#comment-278</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a lawyer, but I&#039;ve watched them on TV, and I think R Kelly will get away with this especially if the girl in the video is unidentified.  Unless this other girl is legit, and somehow she can prove she was with them in a threesome (photos or tape?).  I only know this trial is moving WAY too fast (sarcasm).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a lawyer, but I&#8217;ve watched them on TV, and I think R Kelly will get away with this especially if the girl in the video is unidentified.  Unless this other girl is legit, and somehow she can prove she was with them in a threesome (photos or tape?).  I only know this trial is moving WAY too fast (sarcasm).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Belgrove</title>
		<link>http://popsquire.com/r-kelly/r-kelly-trial-countown/comment-page-1/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Belgrove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 15:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popsquire.com/?p=451#comment-279</guid>
		<description>Ok, someone help me figure this out cause I&#039;m confused. Juan over at Highbrid Nation told me that this new witness has popped up and is saying that she knows that the girl was underage because she &lt;a href=&quot;http://highbridnation.com/2008/05/05/new-developments-in-r-kelly-case-witness-claims-to-be-involved-in-threesome-with-minor-in-sex-tape/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;joined Kelly and the underage girl in a threesome&lt;/a&gt;. So that makes her guilty and Kelly right? Or was she underage also? Which would make Kelly guity in another underage case. Kelly is off the chain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, someone help me figure this out cause I&#8217;m confused. Juan over at Highbrid Nation told me that this new witness has popped up and is saying that she knows that the girl was underage because she <a href="http://highbridnation.com/2008/05/05/new-developments-in-r-kelly-case-witness-claims-to-be-involved-in-threesome-with-minor-in-sex-tape/" rel="nofollow">joined Kelly and the underage girl in a threesome</a>. So that makes her guilty and Kelly right? Or was she underage also? Which would make Kelly guity in another underage case. Kelly is off the chain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
