No Contempt For Christie Brinkley Or Peter Cook
Christie Brinkley and Peter Cook may have plenty of contempt for each other, but the court did not have any for either at today’s hearing.
[Bauer Griffin Online]
Instead, today’s court battle over their son’s passport ended in a settlement.
Although the terms of the settlement remain confidential, Brinkley’s attorney confirms that Brinkley withdrew her counterclaims against Cook and says: “The parties’ settlement approved by the judge today does not grant any of the requests in Peter Cook’s motion which dragged Ms. Brinkley back to court.”
Cook’s attorney acknowledges that his client is pleased with the results because: “She didn’t get what she wanted.”
Translation: Neither party got exactly what s/he wanted, which means this was a good settlement. Courts are always happy to see compromise without having to rule from the bench.
[...] Remember when marrying Christie Brinkley was more of an American dream than a cautionary tale? [Popsquire] Sponsored Topics: Law – Bar association – Organizations – United States – Products and Services [...]