Like it or not, Carrie Prejean may be right. When parties mediate and sign a settlement agreement, they typically agree not to discuss anything related to the mediation session. Of course, that doesn’t excuse her nasty attitude.
At least that’s what a guy who once dated Prejean tells TMZ. He says the former pageant queen was not a minor when she shot the infamous solo sex tape. In fact, he says he’s never met someone who lies so much. Wow.
If you missed Popsquire’s Russell Wetanson on TV Guide Network’s “Hollywood 411″ last night, don’t fret. Here is an encore presentation of the report on Carrie Prejean and Joe Jackson. Enjoy!
For a conservative girl, Carrie Prejean seems to be making Bill Clinton-esque distinctions. She says Meredith Vieira can call it a “sex tape” if she wants to, but the former pageant queen was all alone in the video that allegedly prompted a quick legal settlement.
No more fights about gay marriage. No more fights about fake boobies. No more fights about unauthorized appearances.
What has the world come to? It’s come to a settlement, at least for Carrie Prejean and the folks at the Miss California USA organization.
As a reminder, Prejean sued the organization for religious discrimination, and the pageant officials fired back demanding that the former beauty queen reimburse them for the cost of her breast implants.
This had all the makings of a nasty civil case. Sadly, it’s all over. The parties have agreed to dismiss their respective lawsuits, and the Miss CA folks released this statement:
“Carrie Prejean, Keith Lewis, and K2 productions have dropped their claim against each other and wish each other the best in their future endeavors.”
“We are moving forward from the past and looking towards the crowning of two winners and the new look of the upcoming MISS CALIFORNIA USA pageant, telecast live on November 22nd.”
The open question: How much did Trump agree to pay Prejean to drop her case? How much would be biblically correct?
Carrie Prejean claims to be “biblically correct,” but now the question is whether she is legally correct.
After threatening to file a lawsuit last month, Prejean went for it today, alleging that she is the victim of religious discrimination, defamation, public disclosure of private facts, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and negligent infliction of emotional distress at the hands of Shanna Moakler, Keith Lewis, and the Miss California USA Organization.
This must mean that the defendants were not willing to offer enough money to settle the case before it hit the court system. Given the high profile nature of this case, the parties likely were too wed (pun intended) to their respective positions to enter any kind of compromise.